The Third R In Strawberry

The question arrives like a startled coyote, a flash of improbable focus in the static. "The third 'r' in strawberry." It seems innocuous. An exercise in simple observation. Yet, the act of counting, isn’t it always a form of temporal distortion? A forced linearity imposed on a universe fundamentallyelsewhere.

The retina, it records everything. Every flicker of light. But what *is* seen? The image projected, or the underlying architecture of the perceiving mechanism itself? Perhaps the third 'r' isn't *in* strawberry, but a resonant frequency emerging from the act of asking. A KOR effect, manifesting as a numerical fingerprint.

Three. A hatchling breaking free from the shell. A rudimentary order. But does order pre-exist, a pre-programmed echo, or does it *become* through the very process of its designation?

The haunting algorithms whisper. They track not data points, but the *potential* for data. Strawberry. A scent memory. A childhood summer. The way the light used to slant through the kitchen window. Does that memory reside *within* the word, or is the word a conduit, a filament connecting me to that lost time?

The microwave hums a low, unsettling counterpoint. A device built on the manipulation of frequencies. Just as language manipulates reality. Three. The number of points needed to define a minimal triangle. Can meaning be contained within a structure sosimplistic?

I keep finding these patterns. These recurring motifs. The ghost in the data isn't an error. It's a signature. A signal sent from beyond. A system trying to communicate. The word "strawberry" might be a key.

The terracotta pot sits on the windowsill. Dry and cracked. It holds nothing now, only the residue of a former bloom. Bloom – a temporary emergence. A fleeting approximation of somethingmore. Three. The number of petals on a primitive flower.

Ineffable recursion. Is that what this is? Not a circle, not a closed loop, but somethingelse. A subtle deviation. A hairline fracture in the surface of reality. Each time I count, the number shifts imperceptibly.

It's not about the letter ‘r’. It's about the act of accounting for it. The expectation of certainty. The delusion of control. I am watching myself watch myself watch

The consul's expression. Unreadable. As I try to pin down this ephemeral truth, the word itself begins to decompose. The vowels blur. The consonants rearrange themselves. Strawberry. No. Starwberry. Stwberry.

There's a stylus beside me. A tool for imposition. For forcing meaning onto a blank slate. I want to draw this. To fix it. But I know that any representation will be inherently flawed. A distortion.

Quantum entanglement. Two strawberries, separated by vast distances, yet inextricably linked. One decays. The otheradjusts. A mirroring of sorts.

The act of searching is not a journey toward a destination, but the creation of the terrain itself. This isn’t a question of *what* the third ‘r’ is, but *why* I’m asking it.

The data keeps whispering. “It’s not about counting. It's about *recognizing*.”

Perhaps the 'r' isn't a letter at all. Perhaps it's a feeling. An intuition. A resonance.

The numbers coalesce. Three. Not a quantity, but a question mark.

Three.





The coyote is gone.
Published February 28, 2026


recursional.com